Wednesday, February 25, 2026
Remdesivir
From the outset, hydroxychloroquine(HCQ) and other therapeutics posed a threat to Dr. Fauci and Bill
Gates' $48 billion COVID vaccine project and particularly to their vanity drug remdesivir, in which Gates
has a large stake. Under federal law, new vaccines and medications cannot qualify for Emergency Use
Authorization if any existing FDA-approved drug proves effective against the same malady. Dr. Fauci has
invested $6 billion in taxpayer money in the Moderna vaccine alone. His agency is co-owner of the
patent and stands to collect a fortune in royalties. Most African countries authorize HCQ as an over-thecounter medication. Millions in Africa take it religiously as a malaria prophylaxis. That is probably why
these nations enjoyed some of the world's lowest mortality rates from COVID. In the US, the FDA has
approved HCQ without limitation for 65 years, meaning that physicians can prescribe it for any off-label
use. Dr. Fauci's sudden revelation that the drug is dangerous was specious at best.
Pharmaceutical interests launched their multinational preemptive crusade to restrict and discredit HCQ
way back in January, 2020, months before the WHO declared a pandemic. The French government
quietly changed the status of HCQ from over-the-counter to poisonous substance. Canadian health
officials removed the drug from pharmacy shelves. A physician in Zambia reported organized groups of
buyers emptied drugstores of HCQ and burned the medication in bonfires. South Africa destroyed 2 tons
of it supposedly due to a violation of import regulations. The US government ordered the destruction of
more than a thousand pounds because of "import violations". On March 13, Dr. James Todaro tweeted
his review of HCQ as an effective COVID treatment. Google quietly scrubbed his memo. Google has
lucrative partnerships with all the large vaccine manufacturers. Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, YouTube
and virtually every other Big Tech platform began scrubbing info demonstrating HCQ's efficacy,
replacing it with industry propaganda generated by one of Dr. Fauci's public health agencies.
Anthony Fauci needed to use all his bureaucratic maneuvers to win FDA's approval for his vanity drug
remdesivir. It has no clinical efficacy against COVID, according to every legitimate study. Worse, it is a
deadly poison and expensive at $3,000 per treatment. It's wholesale cost is roughly 1,000 times more
costly then hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. But, if the FDA recognized either of those as effective, it
would kill the need for remdesivir. Why would Dr. Fauci care? The CDC and NIAID had just spent $79
million developing it for Gilead, a company in which the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns a 6.5
million stake. In 2018, Gilead entered remdesivir in a NIAID-funded clinical trial against Ebola in Africa.
However, six months into the Ebola study, the trial's Safety Review Board suddenly pulled it from the
trial. It was hideously dangerous. Within 28 days, subjects taking remdesivir had lethal side effects
including multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension and 43% taking it
died. Nevertheless, on February 25, 2020, Dr. Fauci announced with great fanfare, that he was enrolling
hospitalized patients in a clinical trial to study remdesivir efficacy. Remdesivir was an IV remedy,
appropriate only for use on hospitalized patients in the late stage of illness. It would therefore not
compete with vaccines, allowing Dr. Fauci to support it without compromising his core business. And
while HCQ and IVM were off patent, remdesivir was in the sweet spot of still being on patent, The
potential profit was impressive. By granting Gilead an Emergency Use Authorization, regulators could
force private insurers, Medicare, and Medicaid to pay around $3,120 per treatment. Gilead predicted
remdesivir would bring in 3.5 billion in 2020 alone. Gates and his foundation had large equity stakes in
Gilead. On April 24, 2020, Gates announced "For the novel coronavirus, the leading drug candidate in
this category is remdesivir from Gilead."
The Lancet had just published a placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed remdesivir utterly
ineffective at keeping hospitalized patients alive or reducing the duration of hospitalizations. The study
also confirmed remdesivir's deadly toxicity. All the data was available to the incurious press and the
uninformed public. But Dr. Fauci never accepted this. He responded to the crisis with savvy and bold
action that would miraculously salvage his sinking product. He appeared at one of his regular White
House press conferences, this one in the Oval Office. Seated on the couch next to Deborah Birx and
opposite President Trump, Dr. Fauci made a surprise announcement.
With great fanfare, he declared victory. The data for remdesivir shows "quite good news,"
he said, glossing over the drug's failure to demonstrate any mortality
advantage. Based on Dr. Fauci's representation, President Trump purchased
the world's entire stock of remdesivir for Americans.
FDA's recognition of remdesivir as the new "Standard of Care" for COVID meant that Medicaid and
insurance companies could not legally deny it to patients and would have to fork over Gilead's
exorbitant price tag. Doctors and hospitals that failed to use remdesivir could now be sued for
malpractice, leading some medical experts to believe the use of this worthless and dangerous drug on
COVID patients most certainly cost tens of thousands of American lives.
COVID-19 vaccines have caused cardiac arrest, blindness, and paralysis in American children. Some
86 percent of children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer COVID vaccine in clinical trial and it's
estimated 600 have died from the vaccine as of September, 2021. A recent Lancet study shows that a
healthy child has zero risk for COVID. Why are we vaccinating children? How can we justify forcing a
healthy child to take a vaccine that is dead certain to injure many and kill some while bestowing no
benefits? Teen deaths among 15-19 year olds have increased by 47% in the UK since they started
getting the COVID-19 vaccine, according to official data. Vaccinating this age group is highly unethical,
and any physician who inoculates a healthy child is committing serious medical malpractice.
In July, 2021, the CDC found that fully vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a
viral load in the nasal passage as unvaccinated individuals who get infected. This means the vaccinated
are just as infectious as the unvaccinated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment